Second Grade Christmas Math Word Problems

When working with word problems, be sure to add some problem-solving questions to the mix. Word problems typically require computations  whereas problem-solving requires a little more thinking. There will be reasoning and logic necessary to solve the problem. Questions 1. For Christmas, you got 12 candy canes in your stocking and 7 from the tree. How many candy canes do you have? 2. You have 19 Christmas cards. 12 came from your friends at school, how many came in the mail? 3. You sang 8 songs at the concert at school and your friend sang 17. How many more songs did your friend sing? 4. You buy gifts for your friends, 2 sisters, 1 brother, your mom,  and dad. You buy a total of 13 gifts. How many friends do you buy for? 5. You wrapped 17 presents and your brother wrapped 8 presents. How many more presents did you wrap? 6. On your advent calendar, you ate 13 chocolates. How many more chocolates are there to eat? 7. On the day before the Christmas holidays, only 21 of the 26 students were at school. How many were absent? 8. On the day before the Christmas holidays, only 21 of the 26 students were at school. How many were absent? Notice that in these word problems, the unknown value isnt always at the end. Its important to ensure that there is a variety of childrens math word problems. Some unknown values should occur at the beginning, some the end and others at the end. PDF Printable Worksheet

The Rise of Celpip Essay Writing Samples

The Rise of Celpip Essay Writing Samples Furthermore, both editions include a bibliographic essay that examines the strengths and weaknesses of the principal source collections on this subject, and as such. The introduction also supplies the reader with vital background details. When using information obtained from research it's important to cite all references. Research helps the writer to support any ideas in the paper and complete accessibility to all references ought to be supplied to the reader through citations and a reference page which is to be included at the conclusion of the paper. Stephen's essay is quite effective. Organisation focuses on how the candidate puts together the bit of writing, in different words if it's logical and ordered. The author starts with a rather in depth story of an event or description of an individual or place. You should begin by searching through databases Google Scholar is a remarkable tool for this using key words linked to your r esearch topic. The next CELPIP Writing Sample provides you a thought of the structure you have to follow for your task 1 email. Homework and some fantastic test samples. Thus, essays have come to become an inseparable part of academics. Professor Mitchell obtained a grant to have a category of students to Belgium as a way to study the EU. Many students realize that the college admission essay might be the conclusive element in admittance to a superb university. Make sure to inform your reader why it is you're transitioning from 1 argument to the next, why they are in this specific order, and how each argument helps shed light on a specific element of what you're discussing. In the majority of cases, you're not predicted to decide on any side of the argument. The linking words you use will be dependent on the way you're developing your argument. In the event you have any added materials essential for task completion don't be afraid to upload them along with the buy form. Celpip Essay Writing Samples: the Ultimate Convenience! It's very valuable to take writing apart to be able to see just the way that it accomplishes its objectives. There are several different characteristics of graduate writing that aren't found in different kinds of writing. This section consists of two examples of great college essays. You'll observe a similar structure in several of the essays. Frequently, graduate level writing also provides suggestions for additional research and development past the limits of the training course assignment. It is essential that the writer has a true and very clear understanding of what's being asked from them for the assignment prior to taking on the writing task. If you are requested to assess the usefulness of something, however, you don't necessarily ought to go into as much important depth. This sort of writing always establishes a purpose whilst addressing a particular audience. What Celpip Essay Writing Samples Is - and What it Is Not How you present your argument is practically as essential as the argument itself, which explains why it is crucial your essay follows a logical structure. To compose an impressive short essay, especially during an examination, you must be in a position to hit the question and supply a straightforward answer while at the identical time observing the correct structure of an essay. The simplest approach to specify the form of an essay is to realize the writer's point of view. Comparable to numerous persuasive formats of essays, a high quality discussion essay depends on the capacity of the author to provide a considerable research and evidences that show the a variety of views of the topic. The age old question once it comes to essay writing. Therefore, it's the very first paragraph in the essay. Think of how you would begin an essay. A well-structured discussion essay assists the reader to follow along with the stream of thought in a simple way with no distraction. It is helpful to inspect the essay for basic errors each day or two after writing it, if you've allowed time for this and you aren't then tempted to get started re-writing bits of it! Making notes of vital points though you listen to the recordings can help you remember information that might be useful. You're able to still understand many main points even in case you are unable to understand every word. Another way, of thinking up the outline, involves jotting down the key points of discussion that you need to cover in the body. Writing might be the core task, but reading is just as important. It is among the methods to keep in mind some grammar and spelling rules. Giving credit to each of these r eferences will assist the writer to prevent plagiarism. Students from several backgrounds may not comprehend the reasoning behind plagiarism, which can result in significant problems within education.

The Ethics of the American Invasion of Iraq Free Essays

The American invasion of Iraq in 2003 is certainly one of the more controversial foreign policy initiatives of the 21st century. The general facts surrounding this event are clear: on the 20th day of May 2003, the United States, with support from Great Britain and a host of other western nations, invaded Iraq in response to intelligence reports of weapons of mass destruction. Up until May 1, 2003, these forces fought to successfully topple the regime of Saddam Hussein and to usher in a new era for the Iraqi people and the Iraqi nation. We will write a custom essay sample on The Ethics of the American Invasion of Iraq or any similar topic only for you Order Now However, these facts were not the main source of tension that this military imperative created; instead, the ethical implications behind the invasion and the debates concerning the reasons for entering the war are what have sparked protest, of which most notably has been the record-breaking anti-war rally in Rome one month before the invasion. Unfortunately the debate is too often discussed in terms of consequences alone. On one side the pro-war supporters have cited the need to protect America from further attacks, to stave off nuclear holocaust and to remove a maniacal dictator from power, while on the other side anti-war protesters have argued that the invasion costs far too many innocent American as well as Iraqi lives. Of course, in our ethical discourse we cannot ignore consequences, but along with consequences we must also consider principles. Therefore, in this essay, I will look at the ethics of the American invasion of Iraq through the lens of Kantian ethics. I will begin with a discussion of Kant’s theory and move from this to argue against the invasion based on Kant’s first maxim of the categorical imperative. Kant’s ethical theory is deontological in that it does not focus primarily on consequences, but first and foremost on principles. These principles he forms from practical human reason and the moral principle that he names the categorical imperative. In its two forms this imperative offers a universal ethic that all rational human beings in all ages and from all cultural backgrounds should be able to recognize. The first maxim deals with the universalizing of human behaviour: â€Å"Act only on that maxim which you can at the same time will to be a universal law† (Kant, [1785] 1948, p. 421). The purpose of this maxim is simple in that it forces the moral agent to take his or her actions as implying a universal code. For example, if a moral agent is considering telling a lie because it will prove beneficial to him or her in that situation, he or she must consider that if all other moral agents told lies in the same situations then any society based on a basic level of trust and truth would inevitably collapse. One person’s ethic universalized would destroy an entire social structure. In other words, Kant challenges the ethical person not to make an exception of him or herself. The second maxim deals with the way in which other human beings are to relate to other human beings. Kant states, â€Å"treat humanity†¦never simply as a means, but always at the same time as an ends† (Kant, [1785] 1948, p. 429). People should always be treated as the final goal of our moral actions and not merely the way in which we realize other personal agendas. Although both of these maxims may lend important ethical insights to a discussion on the invasion in Iraq, the first maxim offers a far more concrete model in which to discuss the invasion and therefore we apply it alone. There are many criticisms against the invasion into Iraq, but I will focus on three specific criticisms: insufficient evidence for the invasion, going beyond the United Nations, and the use of military force over diplomacy. Firstly, as admitted by the C. I. A in 2005 and verified by the invasion itself, the claim that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction was a weak—or even false—reason for going to war. It seems, therefore, that the U. S. was simply taking far too drastic steps without proper research. If we were to universalize this practice, the world would be faced with a terrible increase in violence and war. Not only would enemies attack one another on good suspicions, but even allies would be lead to attack one another based on the weak suspicion that each country may have bad intentions toward the other. This type of global policy is not acceptable for a single nation, and this is made perfectly clear in the fact that it cannot be responsibly universalized. Secondly, the U. S. went above the recommendations of the U. N. and acted out of line with the U. N. ’s policy. In this respect, according to the definition of Kofi Annan and the U. N. Security Council, the invasion of Iraq was technically illegal. If we again apply Kant’s universalizing maxim to the U. S. ’s behavior we have another strong criticism of the invasion. The U. N. was expressly created by the consent of most of the countries of the world as a sovereign power that would be allowed to resolved global conflict between nations. As Thomas Hobbes points out in his Leviathan, any individual or group that submits to a sovereign has the responsibility to accept the judgments of that power. The U. S. , in its flagrant disregard of the U. N. ’s policy, clearly did not respect the power of the sovereign and in this way set a dangerous precedent for unilateral military action. If the entire world were to universalize this ethic there would remain no authority in the world and all nations would return to the brutal Hobbesian state of nature. Lastly, the U. S. ’s decision to invade made a clear statement that military action is preferable to the diplomatic option. For any civilized society, war must always be the last option, if it is to be used at all. Many supporters of the invasion may claim that the Bush administration had no other option, but it is clear that the administration did not do nearly as much diplomacy as it could have. Other nations should have been included in the process and negotiations should have been more controlled within the influence of the U. N. If we universalize the U. S. ’s action to go to war before pushing for diplomacy, the diplomatic option in the world would collapse. In this sense, there would be little hope of peaceful solutions to inter-national conflicts, but instead a future of pre-empted strikes and quick invasions. If this would indeed become the case, the world would need far more than Kantian ethics to save it from its inevitable decline. References Hobbes, Thomas (2006). Leviathan. New York: Dover Publications, Incorporated. Kant, Immanuel (1948). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. (H. J. Paton, Trans. ). London: Hutchinson. (Original work published 1785, and published in a collection in 1903; page references to this edition). Kant, Immanuel (1836). The Metaphysics of Ethics. (John William Semple, Trans. ). Edinburgh: Thomas Clark. (Original work published 1785). Paton, Herbert James. (1971). The Categorical Imperative: A Study in Kant’s Moral Philosophy. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Ross, Dennis. (2008). Statecraft: And How to Restore America’s Standing in the World. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux. Steel, Jonathan. (2008). Defeat: Why America and Britain Lost Iraq. Berkeley: Counterpoint. How to cite The Ethics of the American Invasion of Iraq, Papers